Explainer

Why look at Net Overseas Migration as a share of population?

Explains why NOM divided by Australia's resident population can be a useful pressure signal, and why it is not the same as total population growth.

Updated 2026-06-03 5 cited sources NOM as share of population Australia
Short answer

NOM as a share of population shows the scale of overseas migration relative to the country absorbing it. For example, a NOM of about 306,000 against a population of about 27.6 million is roughly 1.1% of the resident population.

The same NOM number feels different in different countries.

A net migration gain of 300,000 people is not the same pressure signal in a country of 10 million as it is in a country of 100 million. Dividing NOM by resident population helps scale the debate.

For Australia, NOM has often been large relative to population because the country uses migration as a major part of labour-force, education, and demographic strategy.

It is useful, but not complete.

NOM share is not total population growth. Total growth also includes natural increase: births minus deaths. It also does not show where people settle, what housing exists, or what skills arrive.

TAMM treats NOM share as a pressure signal, then adds the missing context: housing delivery, capital-city concentration, skills mix, student flows, and recognition lag.

Related questions

Is there one healthy NOM percentage?

No single number works in every context. A higher share can be manageable if housing, infrastructure, and labour-market use keep pace; a lower share can still feel difficult if capacity is already tight.

Is NOM share the same as annual population growth?

No. NOM share only captures net overseas migration relative to population. Annual population growth also includes natural increase.